Two Rules Regarding Dog Bite Cases
Just like a mother to her child, a dog owner will usually have nothing but love for their dogs, thinking they can do no wrong. Raising a dog is like raising a child, you give them nothing but love, so you expect nothing but love and slobbery dog kisses. But we often forget that at the end of the day, dogs are animals and not humans like us. While they may be “domesticated” animals being able to respond to affection, they still possess a degree of their original instinct. While cases are rare, you’ll hear about a dog bite case every now and then. An event in which a dog bites a person for whatever reason, more often than not leaving them with gruesome lacerations, requiring stitches and in worse cases, surgery.
This is exactly what happened to a girl in Las Vegas at Sunset Park, who was enjoying an afternoon with her grandma and aunt, when the wolf-dog hybrid-looking dog attacked her. The girl was running towards the obstacle course when the dog ran and tackled her, then thrashed her. The owner apparently got the dog off the girl, but after seeing how bad the girl was hurt, the owner took off with the dog. A witness saw and was able to write down the license of the owner and the girl was taken away to a local hospital. Because there were no records of the dog that they were unable to identify, the child went through several rounds of rabies vaccines.
Dog bite injuries aren’t completely rare, yet not entirely common. But when they do occur, the injury is more often than not catastrophic in that the injury is “unclean”, as opposed to a clean break or snap of a broken arm, or a jagged laceration, compared to a clean cut on the surface.
Most states have adopted the “Strict Liability” stance on dog bites, meaning that even if the defendant or dog owner could’ve done something to prevent the bite. As long as the person wasn’t trespassing or otherwise not breaking the law themselves at the time of the incident, then the defendant is liable, regardless of whether or not the owner themselves did no wrong. The injured must also not have provoked the dog and caused the injury.
Some states do, however, operate under the arguably archaic “one bite rule” in which the focus is on whether the owner knew or should have known that the dog might bite, and whether the owner took reasonable precautions based on that knowledge. If they didn’t, the owner is liable for the actions they could’ve prevented. Now, sometimes, dog bite cases can be difficult to assess who is responsible. As such, taking legal action, might be needed. An example of a legal business that sets a standard, when it comes to assessing and handling legal cases effectively pertaining to a dog bite lawyer Like Eric Roy Law Firm . Cases that are looked at in detail, mainly involve liabilities, accidents, and various types of personal injuries, that would be associated with the dog bite that took place.